So, an expert panel of top scientists have decided on the top 10 sci-fi movies of all time. In the end, their 'definitive' list is little more than a parade of the populist choices.
1. Blade Runner
2. 2001
3. Star Wars/Empire Strikes Back
4. Alien
5. Solaris
6. Terminator/T2
7. The Day The Earth Stood Still
8. War of the Worlds
9. The Matrix
10. Close Encounters of the Third Kind
Ok, so the list isn't that bad. The likes of Blade Runner and 2001 are clear Sci Fi greats, but does the overly pretentious solaris (original version) really deserve a mention. Similarly, the court (of my head) is still out on The Matrix. Fantastic movie it may be, but it really didn't tell us anything new. It was more a mish-mash of common themes repackaged in an ultracool setting.
Also, why are movies packaged together, as in the case of Star Wars and Empire or T1 and T2? Are these movies incapable of standing the test alone? Viewed separately, Star Wars and Empire are distinctly different movies. The first is a fairytale about rescuing a princess, the second an illustration of the oppression of an evil empire upon it's rebellious subjects. I am of course simplifying, both of these movies have a lot more to them than that, but they are different movies. If you are going to lump them together, then where is the bubbly teddy bear finale (Return of the Jedi)? Where is T3?
Of course we can debate what makes a good sci fi till the apocalypse, and we still won't agree, but I think this may well have spurred me on to write a list of my own. Which of course leaves me with the problem of trying to write a sequel to this blog that tops my high-minded criticisms of the above list. Doh!
Thursday, August 26, 2004
Tuesday, August 03, 2004
A change of direction.
I've never really been a supporter of a major mainstream party. Despite being most closely linked with the Liberal Democrats I've voted for all 3 major parties at least once. A fact I'm not entirely proud of. I buried my conscience in the safe knowledge that I my vote was tactical.
People say that a persons time at University are their most formative. I'd say that's a crock of shit. The last few years have seen my disillusionment with our government and the non-opposition frustrate beyond belief. I have watched as the nation I am proud of marched into war after war like an aging boxer eager to prove it can still cut it with the young guns. Each war was fought on the premise of improving human rights. Very few can claim to have achieved that aim.
I've watched as our Universities have grown to such sizes that we are left with the prospect of an entire generation of people over qualified for the jobs available.
I've watched as my own MP (RT Hon David Blunkett) has pushed through anti-terror plans which invade personal privacy and destroy the few chances we have in this country to congregate and protest.
But most depressingly, I've watched as a party with a stunning commons majority has forced through policy upon policy by threatening it's own members to "toe the party line". It was the same under Thatchers govt. With a large enough majority you can push anything through, and if your backbenchers try to rebel? Threaten them, intimidate them, demote or promote them. Do whatever you can to make sure they vote with you or at the very least... Abstain. This isn't democratic politics. It's a dictatorship.
So in a decision to no longer sit on the sidelines, I've joined those pesky Liberal Democrats, thorn in the side of New Labour and soon to be destroyer of Michael Howard.
Some might argue that joining a political party will not solve anything. That party (whichever it is) will also follow the familiar patterns of the others. Well, the way I look at it, at least as a member of a party I can work to help change things. Not only the things that are wrong with this country, but the things that are wrong with the party itself. A good friend of mine once threatened to tear up his Labour party membership card. He had become so disillusioned with Tony Blair that he felt it was the only way. In the end he was convinced not to. Why? Because at least as a member he has a voice in his party. He can help to change things.
So bring on Hartlepool (assuming Mandelson jets off to Europe) and bring on the General Election.
People say that a persons time at University are their most formative. I'd say that's a crock of shit. The last few years have seen my disillusionment with our government and the non-opposition frustrate beyond belief. I have watched as the nation I am proud of marched into war after war like an aging boxer eager to prove it can still cut it with the young guns. Each war was fought on the premise of improving human rights. Very few can claim to have achieved that aim.
I've watched as our Universities have grown to such sizes that we are left with the prospect of an entire generation of people over qualified for the jobs available.
I've watched as my own MP (RT Hon David Blunkett) has pushed through anti-terror plans which invade personal privacy and destroy the few chances we have in this country to congregate and protest.
But most depressingly, I've watched as a party with a stunning commons majority has forced through policy upon policy by threatening it's own members to "toe the party line". It was the same under Thatchers govt. With a large enough majority you can push anything through, and if your backbenchers try to rebel? Threaten them, intimidate them, demote or promote them. Do whatever you can to make sure they vote with you or at the very least... Abstain. This isn't democratic politics. It's a dictatorship.
So in a decision to no longer sit on the sidelines, I've joined those pesky Liberal Democrats, thorn in the side of New Labour and soon to be destroyer of Michael Howard.
Some might argue that joining a political party will not solve anything. That party (whichever it is) will also follow the familiar patterns of the others. Well, the way I look at it, at least as a member of a party I can work to help change things. Not only the things that are wrong with this country, but the things that are wrong with the party itself. A good friend of mine once threatened to tear up his Labour party membership card. He had become so disillusioned with Tony Blair that he felt it was the only way. In the end he was convinced not to. Why? Because at least as a member he has a voice in his party. He can help to change things.
So bring on Hartlepool (assuming Mandelson jets off to Europe) and bring on the General Election.
Wednesday, July 14, 2004
Fahrenheit 9/11
---------------------------------------------
George W. Bush [to Michael Moore]: Behave yourself, will you? Go find real work.
---------------------------------------------
Okay, before I begin let me say one thing. Michael Moore is NOT the world's greatest documentary film-maker. His work is often populist and his 'facts' are at times poorly sourced. He often asks loaded questions and coaches information out of his prey. He is biased and clearly uses his fame to influence others.
With that out of the way let me now say, I really don't care. Michael Moore is a sound piece for the political left. He's a radical and he's controversial. It's that controversy that makes him famous. It's that willingness to move out of the restraints of traditional documentary film-making that gives him a voice. We can argue for hours about how he shouldn't be allowed to do this, and I can counter with arguments about TV news presenters saying they are biased on national television. I could talk of movies commissioned by the government as propaganda for the masses. In the end it's meaningless. The left will never agree with the right (and vice versa), so I ain't gonna get in too deep!
With Fahrenheit 9/11 Michael Moore has realised that the only way to get into the minds of the American voters is to do the things that the media-supported right does. He has gone for shock value.
---------------------------------------------
NEIL CAVUTO [Fox news presenter, live on national Television]: Am I slanted and biased? You're damned well bet I am.
---------------------------------------------
And in the end Moore didn't have to work hard to shock the American public when the main focus of the film is George W Bush. Just as Bush proved that you don't need hard facts to gain support for a war, Moore now proves that you don't need hard facts of Presidential wrongdoing to make the President look guilty.
We are told the Bush family has had business dealings with the Bin Ladens (FACT). This doesn't prove that Dubya is up to no good, but the association makes you question his trustworthiness. Throw in associations with Enron, Halliburton, and key companies involved in rebuilding Iraq and your President looks dodgier than Richard Nixon.
Is it right that Moore should paint this picture? Well I ask you, what has he done wrong? The conclusions you draw from this film are your own. If you come away from this feeling that Bush is a liar who is cheating the American public then that's your conclusion. Moore may have planted the seeds, he may have coached you towards a conclusion, but it's your choice to believe in it.
Is this as bad as American news organisations openly deceiving their viewers? Moore doesn't lie, he presents a version of history. Just as our politicians do. Just as our media does.
The important thing with this film is not to view it as a documentary. It isn't. You can choose to view it as political propaganda if you wish, but I prefer to describe it as a fact-based political satire. Under that title it delivers on every level for me. It is both funny and gut-wrenching (as real life often is).
You cannot fail to be angry at the end of it. Whether the anger is with Bush or Moore is your choice, but even the most hardened anti-Moore people out there will find it difficult not to be moved by the lasting image of a bereaved mother - who's son died fighting for Bush. Staring at the White House from far away, this is 9/11s Charlton Heston moment. Here is a supporter of the war staring into the White House - through the gates, the security and the walls - straight into the heart of George Bush and asking him one simple question.
Why?
---------------------------------------------
Michael Moore [quoting George Orwell]: It's not a matter of whether the war is not real, or if it is, Victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous. Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. This new version is the past and no different past can ever have existed. In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects and its object is not the victory over either Eurasia or East Asia but to keep the very structure of society intact.
---------------------------------------------
Summary: A political satire that explodes like an incendiary device onto the screen. This film will rock the very foundations of the Bush Administration. A superb piece of work by the second most hated man on Earth (after Bush). Yes I am biased. Deal with it!
9 out of 10.
George W. Bush [to Michael Moore]: Behave yourself, will you? Go find real work.
---------------------------------------------
Okay, before I begin let me say one thing. Michael Moore is NOT the world's greatest documentary film-maker. His work is often populist and his 'facts' are at times poorly sourced. He often asks loaded questions and coaches information out of his prey. He is biased and clearly uses his fame to influence others.
With that out of the way let me now say, I really don't care. Michael Moore is a sound piece for the political left. He's a radical and he's controversial. It's that controversy that makes him famous. It's that willingness to move out of the restraints of traditional documentary film-making that gives him a voice. We can argue for hours about how he shouldn't be allowed to do this, and I can counter with arguments about TV news presenters saying they are biased on national television. I could talk of movies commissioned by the government as propaganda for the masses. In the end it's meaningless. The left will never agree with the right (and vice versa), so I ain't gonna get in too deep!
With Fahrenheit 9/11 Michael Moore has realised that the only way to get into the minds of the American voters is to do the things that the media-supported right does. He has gone for shock value.
---------------------------------------------
NEIL CAVUTO [Fox news presenter, live on national Television]: Am I slanted and biased? You're damned well bet I am.
---------------------------------------------
And in the end Moore didn't have to work hard to shock the American public when the main focus of the film is George W Bush. Just as Bush proved that you don't need hard facts to gain support for a war, Moore now proves that you don't need hard facts of Presidential wrongdoing to make the President look guilty.
We are told the Bush family has had business dealings with the Bin Ladens (FACT). This doesn't prove that Dubya is up to no good, but the association makes you question his trustworthiness. Throw in associations with Enron, Halliburton, and key companies involved in rebuilding Iraq and your President looks dodgier than Richard Nixon.
Is it right that Moore should paint this picture? Well I ask you, what has he done wrong? The conclusions you draw from this film are your own. If you come away from this feeling that Bush is a liar who is cheating the American public then that's your conclusion. Moore may have planted the seeds, he may have coached you towards a conclusion, but it's your choice to believe in it.
Is this as bad as American news organisations openly deceiving their viewers? Moore doesn't lie, he presents a version of history. Just as our politicians do. Just as our media does.
The important thing with this film is not to view it as a documentary. It isn't. You can choose to view it as political propaganda if you wish, but I prefer to describe it as a fact-based political satire. Under that title it delivers on every level for me. It is both funny and gut-wrenching (as real life often is).
You cannot fail to be angry at the end of it. Whether the anger is with Bush or Moore is your choice, but even the most hardened anti-Moore people out there will find it difficult not to be moved by the lasting image of a bereaved mother - who's son died fighting for Bush. Staring at the White House from far away, this is 9/11s Charlton Heston moment. Here is a supporter of the war staring into the White House - through the gates, the security and the walls - straight into the heart of George Bush and asking him one simple question.
Why?
---------------------------------------------
Michael Moore [quoting George Orwell]: It's not a matter of whether the war is not real, or if it is, Victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous. Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. This new version is the past and no different past can ever have existed. In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects and its object is not the victory over either Eurasia or East Asia but to keep the very structure of society intact.
---------------------------------------------
Summary: A political satire that explodes like an incendiary device onto the screen. This film will rock the very foundations of the Bush Administration. A superb piece of work by the second most hated man on Earth (after Bush). Yes I am biased. Deal with it!
9 out of 10.
Friday, July 09, 2004
My return to Blighty.
After a long break in the sun it's time to get back to reality. So it's summary time...
The Greeks won Euro 2004 - and deservedly so - in the biggest shock in international football history. They played old style italian tactics of defend in numbers and counter quickly. Unfortunately England and Italy, both tried the same and failed miserably, while the overpaid, overhyped players of Real Madrid et al managed to fall over lots and make many excuses.
Tony Blair admitted that the WMDs in Iraq may never be found and might have been destroyed. This after saying that the idea Saddam had destroyed them was absurd. Still no apology though from the most arrogant man in Britain. Fingers are still crossed for a resignation at the party conference.
Saddam Hussein stood before a preliminary hearing in the new and improved 'free and liberated' Iraq. Despite the nation now being free... he still hasn't had access to a lawyer or been given the basic rights of a prisoner. The sitting judge was a man who himself worked for Saddams regime and has switched sides, while news coverage was censored so we couldn't hear everything that was said. GOD BLESS DEMOCRACY!
A referee in Euro 2004 went into hiding after two newspapers chose to print his phone number, email address and plant an England flag on his house. All this, because he made the CORRECT DECISION in a football match when he failed to award a goal to Engerland. The man has received death threats and had his personal life invaded. Unfortunately, the xenophobic press has not been properly reprimanded for this and the editors of the newspapers have not been forced to resign. I wonder what would happen if they did the same thing to a politician, or printed some fake photos of Iraqi abuse.
Tim Henman failed at Wimbledon again. Yawn. It rained lots in Britain.
The Greeks won Euro 2004 - and deservedly so - in the biggest shock in international football history. They played old style italian tactics of defend in numbers and counter quickly. Unfortunately England and Italy, both tried the same and failed miserably, while the overpaid, overhyped players of Real Madrid et al managed to fall over lots and make many excuses.
Tony Blair admitted that the WMDs in Iraq may never be found and might have been destroyed. This after saying that the idea Saddam had destroyed them was absurd. Still no apology though from the most arrogant man in Britain. Fingers are still crossed for a resignation at the party conference.
Saddam Hussein stood before a preliminary hearing in the new and improved 'free and liberated' Iraq. Despite the nation now being free... he still hasn't had access to a lawyer or been given the basic rights of a prisoner. The sitting judge was a man who himself worked for Saddams regime and has switched sides, while news coverage was censored so we couldn't hear everything that was said. GOD BLESS DEMOCRACY!
A referee in Euro 2004 went into hiding after two newspapers chose to print his phone number, email address and plant an England flag on his house. All this, because he made the CORRECT DECISION in a football match when he failed to award a goal to Engerland. The man has received death threats and had his personal life invaded. Unfortunately, the xenophobic press has not been properly reprimanded for this and the editors of the newspapers have not been forced to resign. I wonder what would happen if they did the same thing to a politician, or printed some fake photos of Iraqi abuse.
Tim Henman failed at Wimbledon again. Yawn. It rained lots in Britain.
Monday, June 07, 2004
FedCon 12 and the future of Trek
Convention photos
I've loved Science Fiction since I was a boy. Ever since my parents introduced me to Battlestar Galactica the art of placing real life issues against a fantastical backdrop has held a fascination like no other.
It was probably for this reason that I fell in love with Star Trek. The original show may have been produced on the cheap and have aged because of it, but the stories and their impact on western society can still be felt today. Gene Roddenberry hit on an idea to take the problems of 1960's America and implant them in a time and place where they could have a voice.
The show was intelligent, witty and different. It challenged the basic principles of sexism and racism. It deplored war while America was embroiled in it's bloodiest since WWII. It was for this reason that Star Trek grew even after it's untimely cancellation. It reached it's peak in the early to mid-1990's. The Next Generation had achieved something even the original show couldn't - solid ratings.
Unfortunately, all things come to an end. Even by the time of the record breaking First Contact (1996), the seeds of decline had been sown. Trek had failed to move with the times. Deep Space Nine, while intelligently written, struggled in the shadow of The Next Generation and failed to deliver the ratings the studio expected. The answer was to create a show that harkened back to the good old days of Picard. Star Trek: Voyager was a costly failure. It achieved its now standard seven year term but many would argue that it limped across the finish line. Too often did the show re-use storylines from the past.
Voyager, in the end was a poor Next Generation. And while The Next Gen was groundbreaking in the 1980's, it was not something that the disenfranchised people of the late 1990's could ever relate to.
In recent years my desire to see the cancellation of the latest incarnation of Trek (the truly disgraceful Enterprise) has left the entire notion of the franchise in a bad light for me. However, I remain a loyal fan and nothing brings my love for it back to the fore than a superb convention. And nobody does it better, than FedCon.
FedCon XII, again in the German city of Bonn, took place over the weekend of May 21st - 23rd, and was hosted by the typically flamboyant American Marc B Lee.
Guests
Nichelle Nichols ("Uhura" - Original Trek)
Connor Trinneer ("Trip" - Enterprise)
Anthony Montgomery ("Mayweather" - Enterprise)
Robert Picardo ("Doctor" - Voyager)
Tim Russ ("Tuvok" - Voyager)
Grace Lee Whitney ("Janice Rand" - Original Trek)
Robert O'Reilly ("Gowron" - The Next Generation/Deep Space Nine)
J.G. Hertzler ("Martok" - Deep Space Nine)
Musetta Vander (Various - Voyager/Buffy/Stargate/B5)
Virginia Hey ("Zhaan" - Farscape)
Ed Wasser ("Mr Morden" - Babylon 5)
Julie Benz ("Darla" - Buffy/Angel)
Tom Lenk ("Andrew" - Buffy/Angel)
Amber Benson ("Tara" - Buffy)
Richard Arnold (Trek Research Consultant)
Larry Nemecek (Editor - Communicator Magazine)
Lolita Fatjo (Script Co-ordinator - The Next Generation/Deep Space Nine/Voyager)
A typically packed schedule (plus an inability in getting out of bed) meant that I missed a number of guests, so apologies in advance.
Friday
The well documented passport incident had been resolved by the time of registration (at least until after the convention) so we were able to get there on time.
First up were Robert O'Reilly and J.G Hertzler. Their double act routine is, by now, well rehearsed and they didn't disappoint. A superb medley of shakespearean quotes had the audience captivated and illustrated again how much more interesting on stage the theatre actors tend to be. This perhaps didn't help as Julie Benz was next up for us and while some of her talk was interesting she often seemed like a fish out of water. She had some interesting comments about her time on Angel but in truth, that was about it.
Following the brilliantly orchestrated opening ceremony, it was time for the first of the big three. Only a day earlier, the official announcement was made that Enterprise was to continue for a fourth season, and when Connor Trinneer stepped out in front of the 2000 strong crowd you could tell his emotions were mixed with both relief and excitement.
Unfortunately for him, things were not so happy in the crowd. When I traveled to FedCon X, there was so much anticipation surrounding Enterprise that the guest at that event (Dominic Keating) was given a grand welcome. But three years of unoriginal storytelling and appalling viewing figures had left an air of resentment in some sections of the main hall.
Out went the questions about enjoyable episodes and in came relentless questioning about the future of the Trek franchise. Trinneer really didn't help himself. He accused the audience of being downbeat when questioned about the decision to move the show to the graveyard slot on a Friday night (a slot traditionally for shows that are about to be cancelled). Meanwhile he seemed to irate to answer the few questions he did have regarding the his time on the show.
In fairness, it can't be easy. As an actor on a modern trek show he has little input to any of the issues that have caused the shows downfall. Plus, as he kept saying, he'd only just found out he has a job for next year, so he doesn't care about the future. My friends who made Trinneers Sunday panel told me he handled himself better, so maybe he was just jetlagged.
I've seen Tim Russ a number of times and he is always entertaining. He's one of those convention guests who knows how to make the audience laugh. Do something in character. Talk about funny pranks on set. Sing. As always he did all 3 and they were as entertaining as the first time I saw him back in 1999.
Despite all the big names, the star of the day was undoubtedly Ed Wasser. Relegated to the graveyard 9:30pm shift it was unsurprising that so many people left. Even I did! However, I returned for the second half of his talk and was very impressed. The smaller names at these shows are often the most gracious and Ed was clearly taken aback at the level of support he was given. The surprise guest during his talk was his young son, who turns out to be a skate boarding fanatic and he can't be much older than 5!
Saturday
We arrived in time to catch Tom Lenk, who scarily enough talks just like his character in Buffy. Following him was the second of the big three.
Now Anthony Montgomery hadn't exactly endeared himself to me and my friends as he had been on our little flight from Heathrow (along with Bob Picardo, Lolita Fatjo and Musetta Vander). We watched at the gate as he flouted the rules, demanding that he be allowed to take a second (overly large) piece of hand luggage on the plane with him. "I'm not leaving this stuff with these guys to trash" was one of the few phrases we heard.
So by the time he appeared on stage he had a lot to do to convince me he wasn't just an arrogant actor with delusions of grandeur. He failed. Like Connor Trinneer the day before, he also resented questioning about the shows future and by the time he had told everyone to shut up for talking during "his show" I was ready to leave. He was quite frankly, arrogant and somewhat egotistical and he thoroughly destroyed the image he had created at the start of his talk of the young black-american boy struggling against adversity. A word to the not so wise, Anthony. It ain't your show and it ain't no lecture. We paid a lot of money for you to entertain us and you failed miserably.
In comparison, Amber Benson was a breath of fresh air when she hobbled on stage with one leg in a cast. Like Ed Wasser, she seemed to understand the meaning of why these people turn up in their thousands to conventions. She understood that people wanted to be talked to, not at, and she gave some interesting insights into the harsh reality of independent film-making.
A quick hop across the corridor to the other hall and it was time for Lolita Fatjo. It always seems to be the case that I prefer listening to the behind the scenes people than the actors. Maybe it's my own desire to become a screenwriter or maybe it's just because the backroom staff know more about what really goes on. Either way, I've seen Lolita Fatjo at 4 conventions now and she's one of my favourite guests. No longer working for paramount, she's able to talk more as a fan than as an insider. Having been responsible for dealing with thousands of script submissions for Deep Space Nine and Voyager she understands what it means to be a young scriptwriter starting out. Her devotion for the shows she helped to create is clear and her respect for the great writers to emerge from those years (Ron Moore, Ira Stephen Behr, Rene Echevarria to name a few) is not misplaced. I'll look forward to seeing her again at a future con.
The main hall then became host to the dazzling costume performance. As always, these events are spectacular, well choreographed and ultra-realistic. When you hear that some costumes cost up to 1000 Euros, you can see why.
Now it was time for the main star. Nichelle Nichols is an icon for so many. I think she realises this and so when on stage there's a certain regal aura about her. It's shameless, but not off-putting because when she speaks you realise just how big Star Trek really is. The classic stories we've all read about were there. Martin Luther King telling the young actress she must not quit the show because she was a symbol of hope for black people. The many famous black women who's dreams became a reality because they saw Uhura in a position of authority. And of course... that kiss. It's easy to laugh now at something as tame as a kiss, but the episode was banned from many networks (including the BBC) for years for fear of offending people. Nichols may have been playing at being royalty but she certainly entertained.
Another convention favourite is Bob Picardo. A great entertainer with a lot of mileage behind him in classic 80's movies (Innerspace anyone?!). Holly was clearly quite taken with him as she snared him for a dance later that evening and then got chatting to him at the airport on the way home.
Saturday night was rounded off with the party. There's nothing quite like watching 10 fully clad stormtroopers dancing!
It was during that party that I realised something about myself. I don't know if it's the case with all trek fans, but there's more than just a hint of embarrassment about admitting to liking the geekiest franchise around. I've always felt it. And to my own disgrace I have often hid from admitting the geekier side of my persona. It's something I must fight, because the truth is, I have never felt as welcome and at home as I do at conventions.
Sunday
A 4am finish at the party meant that the final day went by in a bit of a blur. The downside to the weekend came at the autograph session. Normally a stereotypical example of German efficiency, this year it left a lot to be desired and caused a serious amount of grumbles when, at ticket number 1000 the decision was taken to stop Nichelle Nichols signings. It was a poor finish to an otherwise superb weekend.
Sadly, we left before the closing ceremony as we had to catch a train to Dusseldorf for a Monday morning appointment at the British Consulate ;-)
I went to FedCon with a feeling of disillusionment about the entire notion of Star Trek. Star Trek was once the ground-breaker. It set the trends and others followed. It hurts not only to know that it isn't at the heights it once was, but also that the current incarnation is just a sad attempt to re-create the past.
I no longer think Star Trek is in turmoil. Enterprise is in turmoil. Rick Berman may rue the day he promised Anthony Mongomery that the show was guaranteed a seven year run. Such arrogance comes only from a delusion that greatness will continue no matter what shit you put out.
Enterprise will be cancelled and be forgotten by all but the few. Star Trek, and the influence it has had on the world will last forever.
I've loved Science Fiction since I was a boy. Ever since my parents introduced me to Battlestar Galactica the art of placing real life issues against a fantastical backdrop has held a fascination like no other.
It was probably for this reason that I fell in love with Star Trek. The original show may have been produced on the cheap and have aged because of it, but the stories and their impact on western society can still be felt today. Gene Roddenberry hit on an idea to take the problems of 1960's America and implant them in a time and place where they could have a voice.
The show was intelligent, witty and different. It challenged the basic principles of sexism and racism. It deplored war while America was embroiled in it's bloodiest since WWII. It was for this reason that Star Trek grew even after it's untimely cancellation. It reached it's peak in the early to mid-1990's. The Next Generation had achieved something even the original show couldn't - solid ratings.
Unfortunately, all things come to an end. Even by the time of the record breaking First Contact (1996), the seeds of decline had been sown. Trek had failed to move with the times. Deep Space Nine, while intelligently written, struggled in the shadow of The Next Generation and failed to deliver the ratings the studio expected. The answer was to create a show that harkened back to the good old days of Picard. Star Trek: Voyager was a costly failure. It achieved its now standard seven year term but many would argue that it limped across the finish line. Too often did the show re-use storylines from the past.
Voyager, in the end was a poor Next Generation. And while The Next Gen was groundbreaking in the 1980's, it was not something that the disenfranchised people of the late 1990's could ever relate to.
In recent years my desire to see the cancellation of the latest incarnation of Trek (the truly disgraceful Enterprise) has left the entire notion of the franchise in a bad light for me. However, I remain a loyal fan and nothing brings my love for it back to the fore than a superb convention. And nobody does it better, than FedCon.
FedCon XII, again in the German city of Bonn, took place over the weekend of May 21st - 23rd, and was hosted by the typically flamboyant American Marc B Lee.
Guests
Nichelle Nichols ("Uhura" - Original Trek)
Connor Trinneer ("Trip" - Enterprise)
Anthony Montgomery ("Mayweather" - Enterprise)
Robert Picardo ("Doctor" - Voyager)
Tim Russ ("Tuvok" - Voyager)
Grace Lee Whitney ("Janice Rand" - Original Trek)
Robert O'Reilly ("Gowron" - The Next Generation/Deep Space Nine)
J.G. Hertzler ("Martok" - Deep Space Nine)
Musetta Vander (Various - Voyager/Buffy/Stargate/B5)
Virginia Hey ("Zhaan" - Farscape)
Ed Wasser ("Mr Morden" - Babylon 5)
Julie Benz ("Darla" - Buffy/Angel)
Tom Lenk ("Andrew" - Buffy/Angel)
Amber Benson ("Tara" - Buffy)
Richard Arnold (Trek Research Consultant)
Larry Nemecek (Editor - Communicator Magazine)
Lolita Fatjo (Script Co-ordinator - The Next Generation/Deep Space Nine/Voyager)
A typically packed schedule (plus an inability in getting out of bed) meant that I missed a number of guests, so apologies in advance.
Friday
The well documented passport incident had been resolved by the time of registration (at least until after the convention) so we were able to get there on time.
First up were Robert O'Reilly and J.G Hertzler. Their double act routine is, by now, well rehearsed and they didn't disappoint. A superb medley of shakespearean quotes had the audience captivated and illustrated again how much more interesting on stage the theatre actors tend to be. This perhaps didn't help as Julie Benz was next up for us and while some of her talk was interesting she often seemed like a fish out of water. She had some interesting comments about her time on Angel but in truth, that was about it.
Following the brilliantly orchestrated opening ceremony, it was time for the first of the big three. Only a day earlier, the official announcement was made that Enterprise was to continue for a fourth season, and when Connor Trinneer stepped out in front of the 2000 strong crowd you could tell his emotions were mixed with both relief and excitement.
Unfortunately for him, things were not so happy in the crowd. When I traveled to FedCon X, there was so much anticipation surrounding Enterprise that the guest at that event (Dominic Keating) was given a grand welcome. But three years of unoriginal storytelling and appalling viewing figures had left an air of resentment in some sections of the main hall.
Out went the questions about enjoyable episodes and in came relentless questioning about the future of the Trek franchise. Trinneer really didn't help himself. He accused the audience of being downbeat when questioned about the decision to move the show to the graveyard slot on a Friday night (a slot traditionally for shows that are about to be cancelled). Meanwhile he seemed to irate to answer the few questions he did have regarding the his time on the show.
In fairness, it can't be easy. As an actor on a modern trek show he has little input to any of the issues that have caused the shows downfall. Plus, as he kept saying, he'd only just found out he has a job for next year, so he doesn't care about the future. My friends who made Trinneers Sunday panel told me he handled himself better, so maybe he was just jetlagged.
I've seen Tim Russ a number of times and he is always entertaining. He's one of those convention guests who knows how to make the audience laugh. Do something in character. Talk about funny pranks on set. Sing. As always he did all 3 and they were as entertaining as the first time I saw him back in 1999.
Despite all the big names, the star of the day was undoubtedly Ed Wasser. Relegated to the graveyard 9:30pm shift it was unsurprising that so many people left. Even I did! However, I returned for the second half of his talk and was very impressed. The smaller names at these shows are often the most gracious and Ed was clearly taken aback at the level of support he was given. The surprise guest during his talk was his young son, who turns out to be a skate boarding fanatic and he can't be much older than 5!
Saturday
We arrived in time to catch Tom Lenk, who scarily enough talks just like his character in Buffy. Following him was the second of the big three.
Now Anthony Montgomery hadn't exactly endeared himself to me and my friends as he had been on our little flight from Heathrow (along with Bob Picardo, Lolita Fatjo and Musetta Vander). We watched at the gate as he flouted the rules, demanding that he be allowed to take a second (overly large) piece of hand luggage on the plane with him. "I'm not leaving this stuff with these guys to trash" was one of the few phrases we heard.
So by the time he appeared on stage he had a lot to do to convince me he wasn't just an arrogant actor with delusions of grandeur. He failed. Like Connor Trinneer the day before, he also resented questioning about the shows future and by the time he had told everyone to shut up for talking during "his show" I was ready to leave. He was quite frankly, arrogant and somewhat egotistical and he thoroughly destroyed the image he had created at the start of his talk of the young black-american boy struggling against adversity. A word to the not so wise, Anthony. It ain't your show and it ain't no lecture. We paid a lot of money for you to entertain us and you failed miserably.
In comparison, Amber Benson was a breath of fresh air when she hobbled on stage with one leg in a cast. Like Ed Wasser, she seemed to understand the meaning of why these people turn up in their thousands to conventions. She understood that people wanted to be talked to, not at, and she gave some interesting insights into the harsh reality of independent film-making.
A quick hop across the corridor to the other hall and it was time for Lolita Fatjo. It always seems to be the case that I prefer listening to the behind the scenes people than the actors. Maybe it's my own desire to become a screenwriter or maybe it's just because the backroom staff know more about what really goes on. Either way, I've seen Lolita Fatjo at 4 conventions now and she's one of my favourite guests. No longer working for paramount, she's able to talk more as a fan than as an insider. Having been responsible for dealing with thousands of script submissions for Deep Space Nine and Voyager she understands what it means to be a young scriptwriter starting out. Her devotion for the shows she helped to create is clear and her respect for the great writers to emerge from those years (Ron Moore, Ira Stephen Behr, Rene Echevarria to name a few) is not misplaced. I'll look forward to seeing her again at a future con.
The main hall then became host to the dazzling costume performance. As always, these events are spectacular, well choreographed and ultra-realistic. When you hear that some costumes cost up to 1000 Euros, you can see why.
Now it was time for the main star. Nichelle Nichols is an icon for so many. I think she realises this and so when on stage there's a certain regal aura about her. It's shameless, but not off-putting because when she speaks you realise just how big Star Trek really is. The classic stories we've all read about were there. Martin Luther King telling the young actress she must not quit the show because she was a symbol of hope for black people. The many famous black women who's dreams became a reality because they saw Uhura in a position of authority. And of course... that kiss. It's easy to laugh now at something as tame as a kiss, but the episode was banned from many networks (including the BBC) for years for fear of offending people. Nichols may have been playing at being royalty but she certainly entertained.
Another convention favourite is Bob Picardo. A great entertainer with a lot of mileage behind him in classic 80's movies (Innerspace anyone?!). Holly was clearly quite taken with him as she snared him for a dance later that evening and then got chatting to him at the airport on the way home.
Saturday night was rounded off with the party. There's nothing quite like watching 10 fully clad stormtroopers dancing!
It was during that party that I realised something about myself. I don't know if it's the case with all trek fans, but there's more than just a hint of embarrassment about admitting to liking the geekiest franchise around. I've always felt it. And to my own disgrace I have often hid from admitting the geekier side of my persona. It's something I must fight, because the truth is, I have never felt as welcome and at home as I do at conventions.
Sunday
A 4am finish at the party meant that the final day went by in a bit of a blur. The downside to the weekend came at the autograph session. Normally a stereotypical example of German efficiency, this year it left a lot to be desired and caused a serious amount of grumbles when, at ticket number 1000 the decision was taken to stop Nichelle Nichols signings. It was a poor finish to an otherwise superb weekend.
Sadly, we left before the closing ceremony as we had to catch a train to Dusseldorf for a Monday morning appointment at the British Consulate ;-)
I went to FedCon with a feeling of disillusionment about the entire notion of Star Trek. Star Trek was once the ground-breaker. It set the trends and others followed. It hurts not only to know that it isn't at the heights it once was, but also that the current incarnation is just a sad attempt to re-create the past.
I no longer think Star Trek is in turmoil. Enterprise is in turmoil. Rick Berman may rue the day he promised Anthony Mongomery that the show was guaranteed a seven year run. Such arrogance comes only from a delusion that greatness will continue no matter what shit you put out.
Enterprise will be cancelled and be forgotten by all but the few. Star Trek, and the influence it has had on the world will last forever.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)